Birkenstock vs Rocky Brands
BIRK and RCKY side by side, both in consumer discretionary. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BIRK and RCKY compare
Birkenstock grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.8% versus 9.2% for Rocky Brands).
Birkenstock keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.8% compared with 5.7% at Rocky Brands.
Rocky Brands pays a dividend yielding 1.3%; Birkenstock does not pay one.
Rocky Brands scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 8 for Birkenstock), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BIRK | RCKY |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $390M |
| Share price | $36.30 | $51.99 |
| Change, 1 year | −12.4% | 72.9% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 35.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.09 | 1.52 |
| Employees | 8,400 | 2,200 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 15 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 | 3 |
| Performance score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 13.6× |
| P/S | – | 0.8× |
| P/B | – | 1.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 9.3× |
| P/FCF | – | 23.7× |
| PEG | – | 6.44 |
| FCF yield | – | 4.2% |
| Fair value | – | $53.56 |
| Margin of safety | – | 2.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 11.8% (better) | 9.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 11.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 9.4% | 54.9% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 11.6% | 54.0% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 0.69% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 56.9% (better) | 42.2% |
| Operating margin | 24.2% (better) | 8.8% |
| Net margin | 14.8% (better) | 5.7% |
| FCF margin | 12.9% (better) | 3.3% |
| Return on equity | – | 11.5% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 9.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.46 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.47 (better) | 2.19 |
| Interest coverage | 5.7× | – |
| Current ratio | 3.78 (better) | 2.97 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 3.36 |
| Piotroski F-score | 9 (better) | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.3% |
| Payout ratio | – | 16.5% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 2.1% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.51% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 1.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.0% | 81.0% |
| Held by insiders | 64.1% | 3.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.1B | −$1.2M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 2.2% |
Go deeper
- BIRK stock overview
- BIRK income statement
- BIRK valuation and score
- RCKY stock overview
- RCKY income statement
- RCKY valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.