Birkenstock vs Crocs
BIRK and CROX side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BIRK and CROX compare
Birkenstock grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (11.8% versus 0.70% for Crocs).
Crocs keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 16.2% compared with 14.8% at Birkenstock.
Crocs scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 8 for Birkenstock), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BIRK | CROX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $7.3B |
| Share price | $36.61 | $159.98 |
| Change, 1 year | −6.2% | 116% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −8.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.09 | 1.25 |
| Employees | 8,400 | 8,010 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 | 14 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Performance score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 11.9× |
| P/S | – | 1.8× |
| P/B | – | 5.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 8.4× |
| P/FCF | – | 9.7× |
| FCF yield | – | 10.3% |
| Fair value | – | $212.63 |
| Margin of safety | – | 24.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 11.8% (better) | 0.70% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 23.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 9.4% | 264% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 11.6% | 337% (better) |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 56.9% | 59.4% (better) |
| Operating margin | 24.2% (better) | 22.6% |
| Net margin | 14.8% | 16.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | 12.9% | 18.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 49.1% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 29.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.96 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 1.47 | 1.12 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 5.7× | 11.5× (better) |
| Current ratio | 3.78 (better) | 1.44 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 4.58 |
| Piotroski F-score | 9 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | – | 9.4% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 9.4% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 92.0% | 106% |
| Held by insiders | 64.1% | 5.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.1B | −$22.4M (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 10.0% |
Go deeper
- BIRK stock overview
- BIRK income statement
- BIRK valuation and score
- CROX stock overview
- CROX income statement
- CROX valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.