Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. vs Royal Caribbean Cruises
BIPH and RCL side by side, both in water transportation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BIPH and RCL compare
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.8% versus 8.7% for Royal Caribbean Cruises).
Royal Caribbean Cruises pays a dividend yielding 1.8%; Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. does not pay one.
Royal Caribbean Cruises scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 4 for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P.), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BIPH | RCL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $82.2B |
| Share price | $14.95 | $307.18 |
| Change, 1 year | −13.5% | 9.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −42.7% | 218% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.67 | 1.64 |
| Employees | 64K | 108K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Performance score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 19.0× |
| P/S | – | 4.4× |
| P/B | – | 8.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 15.1× |
| FCF yield | – | −0.51% |
| Fair value | – | $227.70 |
| Margin of safety | – | −34.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.8% (better) | 8.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 21.1% | 52.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 22.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 2150% (better) | 21.6% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 31.4% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 26.9% | 49.1% (better) |
| Operating margin | 25.1% | 27.3% (better) |
| Net margin | – | 23.5% |
| FCF margin | −0.23% (better) | −2.2% |
| Return on equity | – | 45.3% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 13.5% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 2.23 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 3.17 |
| Interest coverage | 1.5× | 5.0× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.89 (better) | 0.21 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 2.22 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 9 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.8% |
| Payout ratio | – | 26.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 2 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 35.0% |
| Buyback yield | – | 2.4% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 4.2% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 88.8% |
| Held by insiders | 42.1% | 6.6% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $55.3K (better) | −$631M |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 4.5% |
Go deeper
- BIPH stock overview
- BIPH income statement
- BIPH valuation and score
- RCL stock overview
- RCL income statement
- RCL valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.