Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. vs Carnival
BIPH and CCL side by side, both in water transportation. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BIPH and CCL compare
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.8% versus 5.2% for Carnival).
Carnival pays a dividend yielding 1.6%; Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. does not pay one.
Carnival scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 4 for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P.), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BIPH | CCL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $38.8B |
| Share price | $14.95 | $28.83 |
| Change, 1 year | −13.5% | 3.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −42.7% | 16.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.67 | 1.96 |
| Employees | 64K | 160K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 12 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 12.6× |
| P/S | – | 1.4× |
| P/B | – | 2.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 8.4× |
| P/FCF | – | 12.2× |
| FCF yield | – | 8.2% |
| Fair value | – | $30.07 |
| Margin of safety | – | 4.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.8% (better) | 5.2% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 21.1% | 36.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 18.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 2150% (better) | 19.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 31.4% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 26.9% | – |
| Operating margin | 25.1% (better) | 16.0% |
| Net margin | – | 11.4% |
| FCF margin | −0.23% | 11.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 24.0% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 11.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 1.69 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 3.10 |
| Interest coverage | 1.5× | 3.8× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.89 (better) | 0.27 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 1.43 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.6% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 1.6% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 71.5% |
| Held by insiders | 42.1% | 7.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $55.3K (better) | −$13.5M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 3.3% |
Go deeper
- BIPH stock overview
- BIPH income statement
- BIPH valuation and score
- CCL stock overview
- CCL income statement
- CCL valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.