Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. vs Brookfield
BIPH and BN side by side. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BIPH and BN compare
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (9.8% versus −12.7% for Brookfield).
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. scores higher on the StockData Score (4 against 3 for Brookfield), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BIPH | BN |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $14.95 | $39.28 |
| Change, 1 year | −13.5% | −15.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −42.7% | −4.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.67 | 1.46 |
| Employees | 64K | – |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 9.8% (better) | −12.7% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 21.1% (better) | 3.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 104% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 2150% (better) | 145% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 31.4% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 26.9% | 62.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | 25.1% | – |
| Net margin | – | 1.7% |
| FCF margin | −0.23% (better) | −5.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | 1.5× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.89 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Payout ratio | – | 42.2% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 99.8% |
| Held by insiders | 42.1% | 0.00% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $55.3K | – |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 4 |
Go deeper
- BIPH stock overview
- BIPH income statement
- BIPH valuation and score
- BN stock overview
- BN income statement
- BN valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.