Brookfield Infrastructure vs National Fuel Gas
BIPC and NFG side by side, both in gas production and distribution. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BIPC and NFG compare
National Fuel Gas grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (15.1% versus 0.05% for Brookfield Infrastructure).
National Fuel Gas keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 26.9% compared with −6.6% at Brookfield Infrastructure.
National Fuel Gas pays a dividend yielding 2.8%; Brookfield Infrastructure does not pay one.
National Fuel Gas scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 2 for Brookfield Infrastructure), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BIPC | NFG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $7.3B |
| Share price | $39.56 | $76.71 |
| Change, 1 year | −13.1% | −3.5% |
| Change, 5 years | −3.1% | 30.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.70 | 0.40 |
| Employees | 2,700 | 2,322 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 10.7× |
| P/S | – | 2.9× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 6.4× |
| P/FCF | – | 32.8× |
| FCF yield | – | 3.0% |
| Fair value | – | $114.37 |
| Margin of safety | – | 32.9% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 0.05% | 15.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 20.7% (better) | 8.1% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 177% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 169% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 63.6% | – |
| Operating margin | 61.5% (better) | 40.3% |
| Net margin | −6.6% | 26.9% (better) |
| FCF margin | 0.05% | 8.8% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 1.56 |
| Interest coverage | 2.0× | 6.8× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.53 | 3.20 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | – | 1.68 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.8% |
| Payout ratio | – | 29.4% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 16 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 3.6% |
| Buyback yield | – | 0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 2.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 73.7% | 83.6% |
| Held by insiders | 10.8% | 1.4% |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.3% | 5.1% |
Go deeper
- BIPC stock overview
- BIPC income statement
- BIPC valuation and score
- NFG stock overview
- NFG income statement
- NFG valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.