Brookfield Infrastructure vs Chesapeake Utilities
BIPC and CPK side by side, both in gas production and distribution. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BIPC and CPK compare
Chesapeake Utilities grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (64.5% versus 0.05% for Brookfield Infrastructure).
Chesapeake Utilities keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 14.2% compared with −6.6% at Brookfield Infrastructure.
Chesapeake Utilities pays a dividend yielding 2.0%; Brookfield Infrastructure does not pay one.
Chesapeake Utilities scores higher on the StockData Score (16 against 2 for Brookfield Infrastructure), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BIPC | CPK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $3.4B |
| Share price | $39.56 | $140.10 |
| Change, 1 year | −13.1% | 4.0% |
| Change, 5 years | −3.1% | 6.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.70 | 0.28 |
| Employees | 2,700 | 1,300 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 2 | 16 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 5 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 17.1× |
| P/S | – | 2.4× |
| P/B | – | 2.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 10.1× |
| PEG | – | 2.95 |
| FCF yield | – | −9.4% |
| Fair value | – | $168.22 |
| Margin of safety | – | 16.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 0.05% | 64.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 20.7% (better) | 13.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 58.7% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 51.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 7.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 63.6% | – |
| Operating margin | 61.5% (better) | 26.8% |
| Net margin | −6.6% | 14.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | 0.05% (better) | −23.0% |
| Return on equity | – | 12.4% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 8.4% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 1.04 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 3.47 |
| Interest coverage | 2.0× | 3.3× (better) |
| Current ratio | 0.53 (better) | 0.28 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 1.46 |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 6 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 2.0% |
| Payout ratio | – | 49.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 5 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 11.2% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 2.0% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 73.7% | 92.3% |
| Held by insiders | 10.8% | 1.5% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | −$4.7M |
| Short interest, % of float | 11.3% | 3.6% |
Go deeper
- BIPC stock overview
- BIPC income statement
- BIPC valuation and score
- CPK stock overview
- CPK income statement
- CPK valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.