StockData

BioAge Labs vs Rani Therapeutics

BIOA and RANI side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BIOA and RANI compare

BioAge Labs is the larger company, worth 3.5 times as much as Rani Therapeutics ($255M against $73.4M).

Rani Therapeutics grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (449% versus 45.3% for BioAge Labs).

Rani Therapeutics keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −493% compared with −1254% at BioAge Labs.

BioAge Labs scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 2 for Rani Therapeutics), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBIOARANI
Size and price
Market cap$255M$73.4M
Share price$5.55$0.526
Change, 1 year−30.7%−75.2%
Change, 5 years–−98.5%
Beta (5Y)1.800.85
Employees6269
StockData Score
Total score8 (better)2
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score11
Performance score1 (better)0
Health score5 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S29.6×11.1× (better)
P/B0.7× (better)2.2×
FCF yield−40.4%−31.7% (better)
Fair value–$0.366
Margin of safety–−43.8%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)45.3%449% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average–28.7%
Profitability
Operating margin−1402%−530% (better)
Net margin−1254%−493% (better)
FCF margin−1198%−353% (better)
Return on equity−34.6% (better)−249%
Return on invested capital−325%−173% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Interest coverage−913.2×−71.9× (better)
Current ratio15.51 (better)5.26
Altman Z-score5.47 (better)−1.36
Piotroski F-score45 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions82.2%32.7%
Held by insiders21.9%30.6%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$7.8M$49.7K (better)
Short interest, % of float10.4%8.5%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.