Burke & Herbert Financial Services vs City
BHRB and CHCO side by side, both in commercial banks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BHRB and CHCO compare
City is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Burke & Herbert Financial Services ($2.0B against $1.4B).
On earnings, Burke & Herbert Financial Services is cheaper: it trades at 11.8× trailing earnings, against 15.6× for City.
Burke & Herbert Financial Services grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (17.7% versus 5.8% for City).
City keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 40.5% compared with 26.0% at Burke & Herbert Financial Services.
Both pay dividends: Burke & Herbert Financial Services yields 3.9% and City 2.5%.
Burke & Herbert Financial Services scores higher on the StockData Score (17 against 12 for City), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BHRB | CHCO |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.4B | $2.0B |
| Share price | $71.29 | $142.45 |
| Change, 1 year | 15.0% | 17.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 29.5% | 76.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.49 | 0.45 |
| Employees | 832 | 934 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 17 (better) | 12 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 11.8× (better) | 15.6× |
| P/S | 3.6× (better) | 6.2× |
| P/B | 1.2× (better) | 2.6× |
| P/FCF | 15.2× | 14.5× (better) |
| PEG | 1.25 (better) | 1.64 |
| FCF yield | 6.6% | 6.9% (better) |
| Fair value | $73.96 | $110.34 |
| Margin of safety | 3.6% (better) | −29.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 17.7% (better) | 5.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 3.9% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −3.2% | 2.9% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −14.2% | 5.3% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 10.0% |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 26.0% | 40.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | 23.8% | 42.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | 10.5% | 16.6% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.46 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 0.19 | 0.45 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.9% (better) | 2.5% |
| Payout ratio | 38.3% | 38.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | 2 | 15 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 7.7% |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | 2.7% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 3.9% | 5.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 44.7% | 73.6% |
| Held by insiders | 9.6% | 2.0% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $580K (better) | −$2.3M |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.4% | 7.7% |
Go deeper
- BHRB stock overview
- BHRB income statement
- BHRB valuation and score
- CHCO stock overview
- CHCO income statement
- CHCO valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.