Bluerock Homes Trust vs Transcontinental Realty Investors
BHM and TCI side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BHM and TCI compare
Transcontinental Realty Investors is the larger company, worth 14 times as much as Bluerock Homes Trust ($438M against $31.4M).
Bluerock Homes Trust grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (36.9% versus 5.3% for Transcontinental Realty Investors).
Bluerock Homes Trust pays a dividend yielding 6.5%; Transcontinental Realty Investors does not pay one.
Bluerock Homes Trust scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 6 for Transcontinental Realty Investors), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BHM | TCI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $31.4M | $438M |
| Share price | $7.65 | $49.93 |
| Change, 1 year | −22.0% | 16.1% |
| Change, 5 years | – | 29.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.54 | 0.17 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 53.1× |
| P/S | 0.5× (better) | 8.7× |
| P/B | 0.3× (better) | 0.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 28.2× (better) | 77.1× |
| P/FCF | 3.0× | – |
| FCF yield | 33.1% | – |
| Fair value | $27.99 | $31.98 |
| Margin of safety | 72.7% (better) | −56.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 36.9% (better) | 5.3% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | −3.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 22.0% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 23.7% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 15.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | −18.3% |
| Net margin | – | 16.1% |
| FCF margin | 15.1% | – |
| Return on equity | – | 0.96% |
| Return on invested capital | – | −0.96% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 3.49 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 10.11 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | −1.0× |
| Altman Z-score | 0.10 | 1.73 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 6.5% (better) | 0.00% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Shareholder yield | 6.5% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 31.1% | 3.8% |
| Held by insiders | 15.7% | 85.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $696K | $7.8M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.10% | 3.5% |
Go deeper
- BHM stock overview
- BHM income statement
- BHM valuation and score
- TCI stock overview
- TCI income statement
- TCI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.