Benchmark Electronics vs TTM Technologies
BHE and TTMI side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BHE and TTMI compare
TTM Technologies is the larger company, worth 3.6 times as much as Benchmark Electronics ($8.7B against $2.5B).
On earnings, TTM Technologies is cheaper: it trades at 37.4× trailing earnings, against 46.5× for Benchmark Electronics.
TTM Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (27.6% versus 8.9% for Benchmark Electronics).
TTM Technologies keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 7.0% compared with 1.9% at Benchmark Electronics.
Benchmark Electronics pays a dividend yielding 0.99%; TTM Technologies does not pay one.
Benchmark Electronics scores higher on the StockData Score (14 against 13 for TTM Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BHE | TTMI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $2.5B | $8.7B |
| Share price | $68.37 | $82.94 |
| Change, 1 year | 56.2% | 30.6% |
| Change, 5 years | 161% | 480% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.99 | 1.66 |
| Employees | 12K | 18K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 14 (better) | 13 |
| Valuation score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Health score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 46.5× | 37.4× (better) |
| P/S | 0.9× (better) | 2.6× |
| P/B | 2.2× (better) | 4.5× |
| EV/EBITDA | 16.2× (better) | 27.5× |
| P/FCF | 19.5× | – |
| PEG | – | 1.65 |
| FCF yield | 5.1% (better) | −0.17% |
| Fair value | $53.05 | $69.83 |
| Margin of safety | −28.9% | −18.8% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.9% | 27.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.3% | 6.7% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 46.7% | 154% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 50.0% | 147% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 12.3% (better) | 0.12% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 10.3% | 21.2% (better) |
| Operating margin | 3.4% | 9.9% (better) |
| Net margin | 1.9% | 7.0% (better) |
| FCF margin | 4.5% (better) | −0.45% |
| Return on equity | 4.8% | 13.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 6.0% | 13.3% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.16 (better) | 0.50 |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.93 | 1.39 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 6.0× | 7.6× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.99 (better) | 1.78 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.55 | 3.76 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | 7 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.99% | – |
| Payout ratio | 45.8% | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.68% (better) | 0.00% |
| Shareholder yield | 1.7% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 103% | 92.6% |
| Held by insiders | 2.7% | 2.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$12.9M (better) | −$34.8M |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 3 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.0% | 4.0% |
Go deeper
- BHE stock overview
- BHE income statement
- BHE valuation and score
- TTMI stock overview
- TTMI income statement
- TTMI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.