Biglari vs MasterBeef
BH.A and MB side by side, both in eating and drinking places. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BH.A and MB compare
Biglari grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.1% versus −8.9% for MasterBeef).
Biglari scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 1 for MasterBeef), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BH.A | MB |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $1688.84 | $3.62 |
| Change, 1 year | −3.9% | −51.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 138% | −75.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.30 | −0.85 |
| Employees | 2,359 | 336 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.1% (better) | −8.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −1.8% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −1221% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −224% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 61.3% | – |
| Net margin | −5.6% | – |
| FCF margin | 5.9% (better) | −3.0% |
| Return on equity | −4.0% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.36 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.05 | – |
| Current ratio | 3.41 (better) | 1.55 |
| Piotroski F-score | 4 | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 95.1% | – |
| Held by insiders | 68.1% | 72.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $21.6M | – |
Go deeper
- BH.A stock overview
- BH.A income statement
- BH.A valuation and score
- MB stock overview
- MB income statement
- MB valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.