StockData

Biglari vs Cannae

BH.A and CNNE side by side, both in eating and drinking places. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BH.A and CNNE compare

Biglari grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.5% versus −6.5% for Cannae).

Biglari keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −7.3% compared with −41.1% at Cannae.

Cannae pays a dividend yielding 3.5%; Biglari does not pay one.

Cannae scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 4 for Biglari), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBH.ACNNE
Size and price
Market cap–$743M
Share price$1894.15$17.14
Change, 1 year4.4%−4.4%
Change, 5 years144%−52.0%
Beta (5Y)0.251.24
Employees2,3596,602
StockData Score
Total score47 (better)
Valuation score03 (better)
Growth score1 (better)0
Performance score01 (better)
Health score3 (better)2
Dividend score01 (better)
Valuation
P/S–1.8×
P/B–0.8×
FCF yield–−5.8%
Fair value–$28.68
Margin of safety–40.2%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)7.5% (better)−6.5%
Revenue growth, 5Y average−1.8% (better)−32.2%
Net income growth (TTM)−175%–
Profitability
Gross margin60.0% (better)15.5%
Operating margin–−28.4%
Net margin−7.3% (better)−41.1%
FCF margin12.4% (better)−10.6%
Return on equity−5.3% (better)−14.3%
Return on invested capital–−7.5%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.440.07 (better)
Net debt / EBITDA8.58–
Interest coverage–−14.0×
Current ratio2.45 (better)1.24
Altman Z-score–1.35
Piotroski F-score45 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield–3.5%
Buyback yield–34.1%
Shareholder yield–37.6%
Ownership
Held by institutions95.1%84.3%
Held by insiders68.1%15.5%
Insider net buying, 12 months$22.4M (better)−$1.9K
Short interest, % of float–9.2%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.