StockData

BGSF vs YYForce

BGSF and YFOR side by side, both in personnel supply services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BGSF and YFOR compare

YYForce grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (39.3% versus −5.5% for BGSF).

BGSF keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −2.3% compared with −37.4% at YYForce.

BGSF scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 5 for YYForce), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBGSFYFOR
Size and price
Market cap$41.1M–
Share price$3.85$0.040
Change, 1 year−2.8%−100.0%
Change, 5 years−73.8%–
Beta (5Y)0.572.00
Employees1895
StockData Score
Total score9 (better)5
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score03 (better)
Performance score00
Health score6 (better)2
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.5×–
P/B0.9×–
Fair value$10.05–
Margin of safety61.7%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−5.5%39.3% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average−14.7%–
Profitability
Gross margin35.5% (better)13.8%
Operating margin−4.8% (better)−36.0%
Net margin−2.3% (better)−37.4%
FCF margin–−4.1%
Return on equity−4.4% (better)−99.1%
Return on invested capital−17.9% (better)−57.4%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.32 (better)
Interest coverage–−20.0×
Current ratio5.06 (better)2.11
Altman Z-score4.89–
Piotroski F-score5 (better)2
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield0.00%–
Years of dividend growth1–
Dividend growth, 5Y average32.0%–
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions25.5%3.3%
Held by insiders9.7%–
Insider net buying, 12 months–$629K
Short interest, % of float0.34%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.