B&G Foods vs Nomad Foods
BGS and NOMD side by side, both in food and kindred products. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BGS and NOMD compare
B&G Foods grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−2.7% versus −3.4% for Nomad Foods).
Nomad Foods keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 4.2% compared with −4.7% at B&G Foods.
B&G Foods pays a dividend yielding 16.3%; Nomad Foods does not pay one.
B&G Foods scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 4 for Nomad Foods), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BGS | NOMD |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $284M | – |
| Share price | $3.50 | $11.92 |
| Change, 1 year | −25.1% | −1.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −88.6% | −50.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.49 | 0.35 |
| Employees | 2,497 | 7,752 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 4 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Health score | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.2× | – |
| P/B | 0.8× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 17.9× | – |
| P/FCF | 2.9× | – |
| FCF yield | 35.0% | – |
| Fair value | $13.74 | – |
| Margin of safety | 74.5% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −2.7% (better) | −3.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −1.5% | 3.8% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −41.2% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −4.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 21.8% | 26.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | 3.7% | 10.4% (better) |
| Net margin | −4.7% | 4.2% (better) |
| FCF margin | 5.6% | 8.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | −20.4% | 4.9% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 2.2% | 6.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 5.75 | 0.92 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 15.68 | 5.52 (better) |
| Interest coverage | – | 1.6× |
| Current ratio | 2.84 (better) | 1.10 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.14 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 16.3% | – |
| Payout ratio | – | 67.4% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −16.7% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 16.3% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 57.3% | 61.4% |
| Held by insiders | 5.3% | 20.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$248K | $10.2M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 18.4% | – |
Go deeper
- BGS stock overview
- BGS income statement
- BGS valuation and score
- NOMD stock overview
- NOMD income statement
- NOMD valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.