StockData

BioNexus Gene Lab vs Exagen

BGLC and XGN side by side, both in health services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BGLC and XGN compare

Exagen is the larger company, worth 42 times as much as BioNexus Gene Lab ($100M against $2.4M).

Exagen grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.7% versus −67.3% for BioNexus Gene Lab).

Exagen keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −25.1% compared with −82.4% at BioNexus Gene Lab.

BioNexus Gene Lab scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 4 for Exagen), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBGLCXGN
Size and price
Market cap$2.4M$100M
Share price$0.821$4.13
Change, 1 year−83.0%−56.9%
Change, 5 years−99.6%−65.9%
Beta (5Y)0.871.18
Employees6220
StockData Score
Total score8 (better)4
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score02 (better)
Performance score01 (better)
Health score5 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.8× (better)1.4×
P/B0.3× (better)7.3×
FCF yield−35.4%−13.0% (better)
Fair value$7.45$3.60
Margin of safety89.0% (better)−14.7%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−67.3%13.7% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average−8.2%9.7% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin12.3%58.7% (better)
Operating margin−81.8%−20.1% (better)
Net margin−82.4%−25.1% (better)
FCF margin−27.3%−18.0% (better)
Return on equity−33.7% (better)−114%
Return on invested capital−32.3% (better)−167%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.001.66 (better)
Interest coverage–−2.9×
Current ratio6.08 (better)3.46
Altman Z-score0.32 (better)−5.71
Piotroski F-score44
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions0.49%34.1%
Held by insiders31.0%29.2%
Insider net buying, 12 months–−$22.9K
Short interest, % of float0.16%4.2%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.