Saul Centers vs Safehold
BFS and SAFE side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BFS and SAFE compare
Saul Centers and Safehold are about the same size, with market caps of $719M and $800M.
On earnings, Safehold is cheaper: it trades at 7.0× trailing earnings, against 30.0× for Saul Centers.
Safehold grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.1% versus 8.7% for Saul Centers).
Safehold keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 27.7% compared with 11.5% at Saul Centers.
Both pay dividends: Saul Centers yields 8.1% and Safehold 6.3%.
Safehold scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 10 for Saul Centers), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BFS | SAFE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $719M | $800M |
| Share price | $29.09 | $11.30 |
| Change, 1 year | −2.2% | −22.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −43.2% | −91.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.75 | 1.00 |
| Employees | 70 | 72 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 | 20 (better) |
| Valuation score | 2 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 | 3 |
| Health score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 30.0× | 7.0× (better) |
| P/S | 2.4× | 1.9× (better) |
| P/B | 2.4× | 0.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.4× (better) | 8.6× |
| Fair value | $59.07 | $25.51 |
| Margin of safety | 50.8% | 55.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.7% | 12.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.2% (better) | 3.5% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −19.1% | 13.1% (better) |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −26.5% | 13.3% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −2.7% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 98.9% |
| Operating margin | 67.0% (better) | 25.1% |
| Net margin | 11.5% | 27.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | 11.3% (better) | 4.8% |
| Return on invested capital | 52.7% (better) | 4.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | 2.6× | – |
| Altman Z-score | 0.47 (better) | 0.24 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 8.1% (better) | 6.3% |
| Payout ratio | 165% | 44.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 2.2% | 10.5% (better) |
| Buyback yield | −0.68% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 7.4% (better) | 6.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 47.6% | 68.7% |
| Held by insiders | 4.2% | 4.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $332K (better) | −$138K |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.1% | 4.8% |
Go deeper
- BFS stock overview
- BFS income statement
- BFS valuation and score
- SAFE stock overview
- SAFE income statement
- SAFE valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.