Saul Centers vs Centerspace
BFS and CSR side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BFS and CSR compare
Centerspace is the larger company, worth 1.4 times as much as Saul Centers ($981M against $719M).
On earnings, Saul Centers is cheaper: it trades at 30.0× trailing earnings, against 46.8× for Centerspace.
Saul Centers grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.7% versus 0.67% for Centerspace).
Saul Centers keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.5% compared with 8.0% at Centerspace.
Both pay dividends: Saul Centers yields 8.1% and Centerspace 5.3%.
Saul Centers scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 8 for Centerspace), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BFS | CSR |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $719M | $981M |
| Share price | $29.09 | $58.44 |
| Change, 1 year | −2.2% | −0.27% |
| Change, 5 years | −43.2% | −42.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.75 | 0.69 |
| Employees | 70 | 349 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 2 | 2 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 30.0× (better) | 46.8× |
| P/S | 2.4× (better) | 3.7× |
| P/B | 2.4× | 1.4× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 3.4× (better) | 6.0× |
| Fair value | $59.07 | $65.16 |
| Margin of safety | 50.8% (better) | 10.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 8.7% (better) | 0.67% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.2% | 9.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −19.1% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −26.5% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | −2.7% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 96.5% |
| Operating margin | 67.0% (better) | 26.0% |
| Net margin | 11.5% (better) | 8.0% |
| Return on equity | 11.3% (better) | 3.1% |
| Return on invested capital | 52.7% (better) | 8.1% |
| Financial health | ||
| Interest coverage | 2.6× (better) | 1.5× |
| Altman Z-score | 0.47 (better) | 0.31 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 8.1% (better) | 5.3% |
| Payout ratio | 165% | 241% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 2.2% (better) | 1.9% |
| Buyback yield | −0.68% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 7.4% (better) | 5.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 47.6% | 94.1% |
| Held by insiders | 4.2% | 0.67% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $332K (better) | $121K |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.1% | 6.2% |
Go deeper
- BFS stock overview
- BFS income statement
- BFS valuation and score
- CSR stock overview
- CSR income statement
- CSR valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.