StockData

Biofrontera vs Sol-Gel Technologies

BFRI and SLGL side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BFRI and SLGL compare

Sol-Gel Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (68.0% versus 29.8% for Biofrontera).

Biofrontera keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −12.7% compared with −31.6% at Sol-Gel Technologies.

Sol-Gel Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 9 for Biofrontera), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBFRISLGL
Size and price
Market cap$10.4M–
Share price$0.700$55.12
Change, 1 year−28.1%75.0%
Change, 5 years−98.7%−35.7%
Beta (5Y)0.971.00
Employees9228
StockData Score
Total score910 (better)
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score22
Performance score23 (better)
Health score45 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.2×–
FCF yield−53.4%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)29.8%68.0% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average17.2% (better)17.2%
Profitability
Operating margin−14.1% (better)−38.9%
Net margin−12.7% (better)−31.6%
FCF margin−11.5%1.4% (better)
Return on equity–−15.3%
Return on invested capital–−153%
Financial health
Debt / equity–0.00
Current ratio0.7810.37 (better)
Altman Z-score−7.80–
Piotroski F-score35 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions18.6%47.5%
Held by insiders23.6%70.2%
Insider net buying, 12 months–$11.0M
Short interest, % of float1.7%16.3%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.