Butterfly Network vs Nano-X Imaging
BFLY and NNOX side by side, both in surgical, medical, and dental instruments and supplies. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BFLY and NNOX compare
Butterfly Network grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (39.4% versus 15.4% for Nano-X Imaging).
Butterfly Network keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −43.6% compared with −576% at Nano-X Imaging.
Butterfly Network scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 5 for Nano-X Imaging), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BFLY | NNOX |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $1.9B | – |
| Share price | $7.14 | $0.364 |
| Change, 1 year | 222% | −87.9% |
| Change, 5 years | −10.8% | −98.1% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.50 | 1.38 |
| Employees | 220 | 197 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 6 (better) | 5 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Health score | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 15.5× | – |
| P/B | 10.4× | – |
| FCF yield | −1.4% | – |
| Fair value | $1.99 | – |
| Margin of safety | −258% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 39.4% (better) | 15.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 16.1% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 70.3% (better) | −98.2% |
| Operating margin | −46.9% (better) | −601% |
| Net margin | −43.6% (better) | −576% |
| FCF margin | −22.4% (better) | −346% |
| Return on equity | −27.7% (better) | −63.6% |
| Return on invested capital | −75.1% | −59.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.04 |
| Interest coverage | −46.8× | – |
| Current ratio | 3.58 (better) | 2.84 |
| Altman Z-score | 7.10 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 3 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | – |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | – |
| Buyback yield | 0.00% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 59.2% | 13.9% |
| Held by insiders | 20.8% | 10.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$112M | $190K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 16.2% | 9.3% |
Go deeper
- BFLY stock overview
- BFLY income statement
- BFLY valuation and score
- NNOX stock overview
- NNOX income statement
- NNOX valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.