StockData

Butterfly Network vs Edap Tms

BFLY and FOCL side by side, both in surgical, medical, and dental instruments and supplies. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BFLY and FOCL compare

Butterfly Network scores higher on the StockData Score (6 against 0 for Edap Tms), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBFLYFOCL
Size and price
Market cap$1.6B–
Share price$6.08$3.25
Change, 1 year169%61.0%
Change, 5 years−24.0%−39.7%
Beta (5Y)2.470.51
Employees220289
StockData Score
Total score6 (better)0
Valuation score00
Growth score2 (better)0
Performance score2 (better)0
Health score2 (better)0
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S13.2×–
P/B8.8×–
FCF yield−1.7%–
Fair value$1.99–
Margin of safety−206%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)39.4%–
Revenue growth, 5Y average16.1%–
Profitability
Gross margin70.3%–
Operating margin−46.9%–
Net margin−43.6%–
FCF margin−22.4%–
Return on equity−27.7%–
Return on invested capital−75.1%–
Financial health
Interest coverage−46.8×–
Current ratio3.58–
Altman Z-score5.46–
Piotroski F-score3–
Dividends and buybacks
Dividend yield0.00%–
Years of dividend growth0–
Buyback yield0.00%–
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions59.2%41.5%
Held by insiders20.8%6.4%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$112M$593K (better)
Superinvestors holding1–
Short interest, % of float16.2%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.