StockData

BETA Technologies vs AgEagle Aerial Systems

BETA and UAVS side by side, both in aircraft and parts. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BETA and UAVS compare

BETA Technologies is the larger company, worth 286 times as much as AgEagle Aerial Systems ($6.5B against $22.6M).

BETA Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (85.3% versus −35.1% for AgEagle Aerial Systems).

AgEagle Aerial Systems keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −276% compared with −1008% at BETA Technologies.

BETA Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 3 for AgEagle Aerial Systems), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBETAUAVS
Size and price
Market cap$6.5B$22.6M
Share price$27.72$0.360
Change, 1 year−18.6%−73.3%
Change, 5 years–−100.0%
Beta (5Y)2.242.36
Employees1,00858
StockData Score
Total score5 (better)3
Valuation score01 (better)
Growth score2 (better)0
Performance score00
Health score3 (better)2
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S121×2.5× (better)
P/B4.3×0.7× (better)
FCF yield−7.2% (better)−65.8%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)85.3% (better)−35.1%
Revenue growth, 5Y average–58.4%
Profitability
Gross margin62.5% (better)45.4%
Operating margin−1033%−247% (better)
Net margin−1008%−276% (better)
FCF margin−876%−165% (better)
Return on equity−46.8% (better)−106%
Return on invested capital−135%−135% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.120.00 (better)
Interest coverage−37.6×–
Current ratio11.51 (better)6.43
Altman Z-score9.57 (better)−8.12
Piotroski F-score55
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions48.9%10.1%
Held by insiders21.1%1.9%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$19.7M$9.9K (better)
Short interest, % of float7.3%5.3%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.