Beneficient vs Bakkt
BENF and BKKT side by side, both in finance services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BENF and BKKT compare
Bakkt is the larger company, worth 17 times as much as Beneficient ($178M against $10.5M).
Bakkt scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 4 for Beneficient), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BENF | BKKT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $10.5M | $178M |
| Share price | $0.681 | $3.96 |
| Change, 1 year | −82.8% | −81.1% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −99.2% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.79 | 3.06 |
| Employees | 50 | 48 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 8 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 5 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/B | – | 0.5× |
| FCF yield | −369% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 141% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −271% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Return on equity | – | −0.75% |
| Return on invested capital | – | −72.9% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | – | 3.09 |
| Altman Z-score | −13.90 | −1.15 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 2 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | −6.7% | – |
| Shareholder yield | −6.7% | 0.00% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 36.6% | 27.5% |
| Held by insiders | 100% | 48.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $35.0K | $8.8M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 35.5% |
Go deeper
- BENF stock overview
- BENF income statement
- BENF valuation and score
- BKKT stock overview
- BKKT income statement
- BKKT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.