StockData

Bel Fuse vs Shoals Technologies

BELFA and SHLS side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BELFA and SHLS compare

Shoals Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (49.2% versus 25.3% for Bel Fuse).

Shoals Technologies scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 9 for Bel Fuse), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBELFASHLS
Size and price
Market cap–$1.4B
Share price$184.22$8.07
Change, 1 year39.9%−9.6%
Change, 5 years1109%−75.5%
Beta (5Y)1.181.09
Employees3211,480
StockData Score
Total score912 (better)
Valuation score04 (better)
Growth score23 (better)
Performance score22
Health score5 (better)3
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/E–35.1×
P/S–2.1×
P/B–2.1×
EV/EBITDA–15.8×
FCF yield–−2.5%
Fair value–$9.76
Margin of safety–17.3%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)25.3%49.2% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average7.7%22.0% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)–13.7%
EPS growth (TTM)–15.0%
Profitability
Gross margin39.5% (better)30.9%
Operating margin15.9% (better)11.2%
Net margin–5.8%
FCF margin9.9% (better)−5.3%
Return on equity–6.2%
Return on invested capital16.5% (better)8.6%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Net debt / EBITDA−2.11–
Interest coverage10.8× (better)5.7×
Current ratio4.48 (better)2.45
Altman Z-score–3.78
Piotroski F-score7 (better)6
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions96.6%105%
Held by insiders5.3%2.0%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$17.2M−$618K (better)
Short interest, % of float–9.5%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.