Bel Fuse vs Methode Electronics
BELFA and MEI side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BELFA and MEI compare
Bel Fuse grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (25.3% versus 1.4% for Methode Electronics).
Methode Electronics pays a dividend yielding 1.6%; Bel Fuse does not pay one.
Bel Fuse scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 8 for Methode Electronics), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BELFA | MEI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $443M |
| Share price | $184.22 | $12.43 |
| Change, 1 year | 39.9% | 88.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 1109% | −73.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.18 | 1.50 |
| Employees | 321 | 6,650 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | – | 0.4× |
| P/B | – | 0.7× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 10.3× |
| FCF yield | – | −3.0% |
| Fair value | – | $25.81 |
| Margin of safety | – | 51.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 25.3% (better) | 1.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.7% (better) | −1.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 39.5% (better) | 19.8% |
| Operating margin | 15.9% (better) | 0.36% |
| Net margin | – | −3.5% |
| FCF margin | 9.9% (better) | −1.3% |
| Return on equity | – | −5.4% |
| Return on invested capital | 16.5% (better) | 0.34% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.47 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −2.11 | 3.14 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 10.8× | – |
| Current ratio | 4.48 (better) | 2.41 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 2.12 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 1.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | −12.9% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 1.6% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 96.6% | 95.2% |
| Held by insiders | 5.3% | 2.8% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$17.2M | – |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 8.9% |
Go deeper
- BELFA stock overview
- BELFA income statement
- BELFA valuation and score
- MEI stock overview
- MEI income statement
- MEI valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.