Bel Fuse vs CTS
BELFA and CTS side by side, both in electronic components and accessories. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BELFA and CTS compare
Bel Fuse grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (25.3% versus 7.6% for CTS).
CTS pays a dividend yielding 0.26%; Bel Fuse does not pay one.
CTS scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 9 for Bel Fuse), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BELFA | CTS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | – | $1.7B |
| Share price | $184.22 | $61.01 |
| Change, 1 year | 39.9% | 47.5% |
| Change, 5 years | 1109% | 62.6% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.18 | 0.97 |
| Employees | 321 | 3,820 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 19 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 3 (better) |
| Performance score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 24.1× |
| P/S | – | 3.0× |
| P/B | – | 3.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 12.1× |
| P/FCF | – | 16.1× |
| PEG | – | 4.17 |
| FCF yield | – | 6.2% |
| Fair value | – | $68.04 |
| Margin of safety | – | 10.3% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 25.3% (better) | 7.6% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 7.7% (better) | 5.0% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 29.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 33.2% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 15.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 39.5% | 40.6% (better) |
| Operating margin | 15.9% | 17.0% (better) |
| Net margin | – | 12.9% |
| FCF margin | 9.9% | 19.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | – | 13.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 16.5% (better) | 14.7% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −2.11 | – |
| Interest coverage | 10.8× | 32.9× (better) |
| Current ratio | 4.48 (better) | 2.59 |
| Altman Z-score | – | 7.11 |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 8 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 0.26% |
| Payout ratio | – | 6.2% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 0.00% |
| Buyback yield | – | 1.8% |
| Shareholder yield | – | 2.1% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 96.6% | 98.9% |
| Held by insiders | 5.3% | 6.7% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$17.2M | −$9.8M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | – | 4.2% |
Go deeper
- BELFA stock overview
- BELFA income statement
- BELFA valuation and score
- CTS stock overview
- CTS income statement
- CTS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.