Mobile Infrastructure vs FRP
BEEP and FRPH side by side, both in real estate. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BEEP and FRPH compare
FRP is the larger company, worth 3.5 times as much as Mobile Infrastructure ($360M against $104M).
FRP grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (2.5% versus −4.1% for Mobile Infrastructure).
FRP keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 0.22% compared with −67.2% at Mobile Infrastructure.
Mobile Infrastructure scores higher on the StockData Score (3 against 1 for FRP), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BEEP | FRPH |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $104M | $360M |
| Share price | $2.52 | $18.75 |
| Change, 1 year | −28.0% | −19.0% |
| Change, 5 years | – | −42.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.14 | 0.49 |
| Employees | 18 | 25 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 3 (better) | 1 |
| Valuation score | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 3.0× (better) | 8.3× |
| P/B | 0.8× (better) | 0.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 15.3× |
| FCF yield | – | −11.5% |
| Fair value | $3.10 | $17.51 |
| Margin of safety | 18.6% (better) | −7.1% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −4.1% | 2.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 12.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −98.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −100% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −22.9% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | – | 11.6% |
| Net margin | −67.2% | 0.22% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | −95.1% |
| Return on equity | −16.1% | 0.02% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | – | 1.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.22 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | 1.8× |
| Altman Z-score | −0.28 | 0.78 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 3 | 4 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 4.9% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 4.9% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 63.8% | 47.9% |
| Held by insiders | 69.7% | 24.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | – | $10.4M |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.74% | 4.1% |
Go deeper
- BEEP stock overview
- BEEP income statement
- BEEP valuation and score
- FRPH stock overview
- FRPH income statement
- FRPH valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.