StockData

Beam Global vs XCHG

BEEM and XCH side by side, both in electronic and other electrical equipment and components, except computer equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BEEM and XCH compare

Beam Global grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−20.5% versus −40.5% for XCHG).

Beam Global keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −64.6% compared with −129% at XCHG.

Beam Global scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 1 for XCHG), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBEEMXCH
Size and price
Market cap$15.2M–
Share price$0.673$5.45
Change, 1 year−70.9%−81.2%
Change, 5 years−97.7%–
Beta (5Y)1.410.78
Employees22085
StockData Score
Total score5 (better)1
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score00
Performance score00
Health score2 (better)1
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.6×–
P/B0.8×–
FCF yield−84.9%–
Fair value$1.42–
Margin of safety52.7%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−20.5% (better)−40.5%
Revenue growth, 5Y average35.4%–
Profitability
Gross margin10.2%46.2% (better)
Operating margin−64.9% (better)−130%
Net margin−64.6% (better)−129%
FCF margin−48.8%–
Return on equity−72.7% (better)−183%
Return on invested capital−63.3% (better)−209%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00 (better)0.78
Interest coverage−861.4×−151.8× (better)
Current ratio1.46 (better)1.23
Altman Z-score−5.30–
Piotroski F-score3 (better)2
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%–
Ownership
Held by institutions9.7%0.01%
Held by insiders5.8%61.6%
Short interest, % of float8.7%–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.