StockData

Beam Therapeutics vs 4D Molecular Therapeutics

BEAM and FDMT side by side, both in drugs. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BEAM and FDMT compare

Beam Therapeutics is the larger company, worth 2.8 times as much as 4D Molecular Therapeutics ($2.7B against $938M).

4D Molecular Therapeutics grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (278712% versus 159% for Beam Therapeutics).

Beam Therapeutics keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −54.7% compared with −195% at 4D Molecular Therapeutics.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBEAMFDMT
Size and price
Market cap$2.7B$938M
Share price$25.81$12.99
Change, 1 year19.2%27.7%
Change, 5 years−71.2%−43.7%
Beta (5Y)2.011.35
Employees511196
StockData Score
Total score77
Valuation score00
Growth score22
Performance score22
Health score33
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S17.1×10.2× (better)
P/B2.5×2.3× (better)
FCF yield−14.0%–
Fair value$24.42$12.76
Margin of safety−5.7%−1.8% (better)
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)159%278712% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average466% (better)44.3%
Profitability
Operating margin−242%−214% (better)
Net margin−54.7% (better)−195%
FCF margin−239%–
Return on equity−8.1% (better)−43.3%
Return on invested capital–−161%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.090.05 (better)
Current ratio14.57 (better)8.03
Altman Z-score3.303.87 (better)
Piotroski F-score44
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions106%80.5%
Held by insiders3.4%2.1%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$19.7M−$5.3M (better)
Superinvestors holding1–
Short interest, % of float26.1%15.4%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.