Bloom Energy vs FuelCell Energy
BE and FCEL side by side, both in electronic and other electrical equipment and components, except computer equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BE and FCEL compare
Bloom Energy is the larger company, worth 67 times as much as FuelCell Energy ($59.8B against $897M).
Bloom Energy grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (91.0% versus 1.1% for FuelCell Energy).
Bloom Energy scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 7 for FuelCell Energy), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BE | FCEL |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $59.8B | $897M |
| Share price | $203.17 | $11.22 |
| Change, 1 year | 51.9% | 37.2% |
| Change, 5 years | 535% | −95.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 2.21 | 1.47 |
| Employees | 2,214 | 424 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 10 (better) | 7 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Growth score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 3 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 19.2× | 5.8× (better) |
| P/B | 37.1× | 0.9× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 171× | – |
| P/FCF | 95.8× | – |
| FCF yield | 1.0% (better) | −11.3% |
| Fair value | $30.25 | $23.91 |
| Margin of safety | −572% | 53.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 91.0% (better) | 1.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 20.6% (better) | 17.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 31.2% (better) | −32.4% |
| Operating margin | 11.2% (better) | −116% |
| Net margin | – | −114% |
| FCF margin | 20.1% (better) | −65.6% |
| Return on equity | – | −22.9% |
| Return on invested capital | 27.0% (better) | −29.0% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.54 | 0.16 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | −0.52 | – |
| Interest coverage | 8.2× (better) | −16.0× |
| Current ratio | 4.09 | 8.67 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 9.58 (better) | 0.24 |
| Piotroski F-score | – | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | −0.12% | – |
| Shareholder yield | −0.12% | 0.00% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 78.6% | 51.7% |
| Held by insiders | 7.1% | 0.35% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$163M | $577K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.7% | – |
Go deeper
- BE stock overview
- BE income statement
- BE valuation and score
- FCEL stock overview
- FCEL income statement
- FCEL valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.