StockData

Biodesix vs Exagen

BDSX and XGN side by side, both in health services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BDSX and XGN compare

Biodesix and Exagen are about the same size, with market caps of $107M and $122M.

Biodesix grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (31.2% versus 13.7% for Exagen).

Exagen keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −25.1% compared with −25.7% at Biodesix.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBDSXXGN
Size and price
Market cap$107M$122M
Share price$10.12$5.04
Change, 1 year34.2%−46.8%
Change, 5 years−92.1%−58.4%
Beta (5Y)0.731.21
Employees334220
StockData Score
Total score44
Valuation score00
Growth score22
Performance score11
Health score11
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S1.0× (better)1.7×
P/B12.3×8.9× (better)
FCF yield−17.9%−10.7% (better)
Fair value–$3.68
Margin of safety–−36.7%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)31.2% (better)13.7%
Revenue growth, 5Y average14.2% (better)9.7%
Profitability
Gross margin–58.7%
Operating margin−18.7% (better)−20.1%
Net margin−25.7%−25.1% (better)
FCF margin−18.1%−18.0% (better)
Return on equity−779%−114% (better)
Return on invested capital−55.4% (better)−167%
Financial health
Debt / equity5.431.66 (better)
Interest coverage−2.5× (better)−2.9×
Current ratio2.963.46 (better)
Altman Z-score−6.23−5.39 (better)
Piotroski F-score34 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield−30.7%–
Shareholder yield−30.7%0.00% (better)
Ownership
Held by institutions41.4%34.1%
Held by insiders–29.2%
Insider net buying, 12 months$3.0M (better)−$396K
Short interest, % of float–4.2%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.