Brandywine Realty Trust vs Safehold
BDN and SAFE side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BDN and SAFE compare
Safehold is the larger company, worth 1.5 times as much as Brandywine Realty Trust ($800M against $520M).
Safehold grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (12.1% versus −2.1% for Brandywine Realty Trust).
Safehold keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 27.7% compared with −40.8% at Brandywine Realty Trust.
Both pay dividends: Brandywine Realty Trust yields 10.7% and Safehold 6.3%.
Safehold scores higher on the StockData Score (20 against 12 for Brandywine Realty Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BDN | SAFE |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $520M | $800M |
| Share price | $2.98 | $11.30 |
| Change, 1 year | −13.9% | −22.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −79.0% | −91.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.02 | 1.00 |
| Employees | 268 | 72 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 | 20 (better) |
| Valuation score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Health score | 4 | 4 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 7.0× |
| P/S | 1.1× (better) | 1.9× |
| P/B | 0.8× | 0.3× (better) |
| EV/EBITDA | 1.1× (better) | 8.6× |
| Fair value | $8.37 | $25.51 |
| Margin of safety | 64.4% (better) | 55.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −2.1% | 12.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −2.0% | 3.5% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 13.1% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 13.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 61.3% | 98.9% (better) |
| Operating margin | 2.7% | 25.1% (better) |
| Net margin | −40.8% | 27.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | −26.9% | 4.8% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 1.9% | 4.3% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Altman Z-score | 0.28 (better) | 0.24 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 5 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 10.7% (better) | 6.3% |
| Payout ratio | – | 44.1% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −7.0% | 10.5% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 10.7% (better) | 6.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 73.3% | 68.7% |
| Held by insiders | 4.9% | 4.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $399K (better) | −$138K |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.5% | 4.8% |
Go deeper
- BDN stock overview
- BDN income statement
- BDN valuation and score
- SAFE stock overview
- SAFE income statement
- SAFE valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.