Brandywine Realty Trust vs Independence Realty Trust
BDN and IRT side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BDN and IRT compare
Independence Realty Trust is the larger company, worth 6.7 times as much as Brandywine Realty Trust ($3.5B against $520M).
Independence Realty Trust grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.5% versus −2.1% for Brandywine Realty Trust).
Independence Realty Trust keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 6.5% compared with −40.8% at Brandywine Realty Trust.
Both pay dividends: Brandywine Realty Trust yields 10.7% and Independence Realty Trust 4.8%.
Brandywine Realty Trust scores higher on the StockData Score (12 against 6 for Independence Realty Trust), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BDN | IRT |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $520M | $3.5B |
| Share price | $2.98 | $14.72 |
| Change, 1 year | −13.9% | −2.6% |
| Change, 5 years | −79.0% | −39.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.02 | 0.82 |
| Employees | 268 | 904 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 12 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 1 |
| Growth score | 1 | 1 |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 81.8× |
| P/S | 1.1× (better) | 5.2× |
| P/B | 0.8× (better) | 1.0× |
| EV/EBITDA | 1.1× | – |
| Fair value | $8.37 | $10.46 |
| Margin of safety | 64.4% (better) | −40.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −2.1% | 3.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −2.0% | 25.4% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 56.6% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 50.0% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 8.4% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 61.3% | – |
| Operating margin | 2.7% | – |
| Net margin | −40.8% | 6.5% (better) |
| Return on equity | −26.9% | 1.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 1.9% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Altman Z-score | 0.28 | 0.76 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 10.7% (better) | 4.8% |
| Payout ratio | – | 370% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −7.0% | 4.4% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 10.7% (better) | 4.8% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 73.3% | 99.0% |
| Held by insiders | 4.9% | 0.79% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $399K (better) | −$90.1K |
| Short interest, % of float | 6.5% | 8.2% |
Go deeper
- BDN stock overview
- BDN income statement
- BDN valuation and score
- IRT stock overview
- IRT income statement
- IRT valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.