Brandywine Realty Trust vs Cousins Properties
BDN and CUZ side by side, both in miscellaneous investing. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BDN and CUZ compare
Cousins Properties is the larger company, worth 9.2 times as much as Brandywine Realty Trust ($4.9B against $529M).
Cousins Properties grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.5% versus 3.5% for Brandywine Realty Trust).
Cousins Properties keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 1.4% compared with −27.6% at Brandywine Realty Trust.
Both pay dividends: Brandywine Realty Trust yields 10.3% and Cousins Properties 4.3%.
Brandywine Realty Trust scores higher on the StockData Score (13 against 8 for Cousins Properties), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BDN | CUZ |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $529M | $4.9B |
| Share price | $3.11 | $29.64 |
| Change, 1 year | −8.0% | 14.7% |
| Change, 5 years | −78.0% | −24.3% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.99 | 0.91 |
| Employees | 268 | 351 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 13 (better) | 8 |
| Valuation score | 4 (better) | 3 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 1 | 1 |
| Health score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 329× |
| P/S | 1.1× (better) | 4.7× |
| P/B | 0.8× (better) | 1.1× |
| EV/EBITDA | 0.8× (better) | 4.3× |
| Fair value | $10.24 | $34.75 |
| Margin of safety | 69.6% (better) | 14.7% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.5% | 8.5% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −2.0% | 6.1% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −74.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −74.3% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −31.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 59.5% | 68.4% (better) |
| Operating margin | 19.0% | 68.3% (better) |
| Net margin | −27.6% | 1.4% (better) |
| Return on equity | −18.6% | 0.32% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 13.8% (better) | 12.3% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | – |
| Interest coverage | – | 4.0× |
| Altman Z-score | 0.37 | 1.05 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | 6 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 10.3% (better) | 4.3% |
| Payout ratio | – | 1445% |
| Years of dividend growth | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | −7.0% | 1.3% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 10.3% (better) | 4.3% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 75.2% | 105% |
| Held by insiders | 5.0% | 1.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $100K (better) | −$178K |
| Superinvestors holding | – | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 4.2% | 8.1% |
Go deeper
- BDN stock overview
- BDN income statement
- BDN valuation and score
- CUZ stock overview
- CUZ income statement
- CUZ valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.