StockData

Baird Medical Investment vs Orchestra BioMed

BDMD and OBIO side by side, both in surgical, medical, and dental instruments and supplies. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BDMD and OBIO compare

Orchestra BioMed grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (1007% versus −39.2% for Baird Medical Investment).

Baird Medical Investment keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −121% compared with −183% at Orchestra BioMed.

Orchestra BioMed scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 2 for Baird Medical Investment), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBDMDOBIO
Size and price
Market cap–$436M
Share price$0.090$7.25
Change, 1 year−93.0%64.0%
Change, 5 years–−26.5%
Beta (5Y)−0.050.84
Employees14686
StockData Score
Total score29 (better)
Valuation score00
Growth score03 (better)
Performance score01 (better)
Health score25 (better)
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S–14.0×
FCF yield–−14.7%
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−39.2%1007% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)−319%–
EPS growth (TTM)−272%–
Profitability
Gross margin83.8%99.6% (better)
Operating margin−114% (better)−195%
Net margin−121% (better)−183%
FCF margin−6.2% (better)−206%
Return on equity−77.5%–
Return on invested capital−48.2%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.22–
Interest coverage−72.3×–
Current ratio1.297.25 (better)
Altman Z-score–−3.18
Piotroski F-score16 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield–0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions–46.1%
Held by insiders62.0%56.6%
Insider net buying, 12 months–$6.1M
Short interest, % of float–10.5%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.