Flanigans Enterprises vs GEN Restaurant
BDL and GENK side by side, both in eating and drinking places. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BDL and GENK compare
Flanigans Enterprises is the larger company, worth 14 times as much as GEN Restaurant ($111M against $7.9M).
Flanigans Enterprises grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (7.1% versus −2.9% for GEN Restaurant).
Flanigans Enterprises keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.1% compared with −2.1% at GEN Restaurant.
Flanigans Enterprises pays a dividend yielding 1.0%; GEN Restaurant does not pay one.
Flanigans Enterprises scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 3 for GEN Restaurant), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BDL | GENK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $111M | $7.9M |
| Share price | $59.97 | $1.49 |
| Change, 1 year | 89.4% | −51.8% |
| Change, 5 years | 104% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.30 | 1.12 |
| Employees | 2,033 | 2,700 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 3 |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 2 (better) | 0 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 16.8× | – |
| P/S | 0.5× | 0.0× (better) |
| P/B | 1.6× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.9× | – |
| P/FCF | 24.1× | – |
| FCF yield | 4.1% (better) | −247% |
| Fair value | $74.05 | $18.05 |
| Margin of safety | 19.0% | 91.7% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.1% (better) | −2.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.7% | – |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 53.6% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 53.2% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 35.2% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | 5.3% (better) | −13.5% |
| Net margin | 3.1% (better) | −2.1% |
| FCF margin | 2.1% (better) | −9.3% |
| Return on equity | 9.9% | – |
| Return on invested capital | 15.2% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.45 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.16 | – |
| Interest coverage | 10.3× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.04 (better) | 0.29 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.29 (better) | 0.27 |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 2 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.0% (better) | 0.00% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Shareholder yield | 1.0% (better) | 0.00% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 10.4% | 1.8% |
| Held by insiders | 70.5% | 58.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $119K | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 0.94% | 2.1% |
Go deeper
- BDL stock overview
- BDL income statement
- BDL valuation and score
- GENK stock overview
- GENK income statement
- GENK valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.