Flanigans Enterprises vs Biglari
BDL and BH.A side by side, both in eating and drinking places. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BDL and BH.A compare
Biglari grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (8.1% versus 7.1% for Flanigans Enterprises).
Flanigans Enterprises keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 3.1% compared with −5.6% at Biglari.
Flanigans Enterprises pays a dividend yielding 1.0%; Biglari does not pay one.
Flanigans Enterprises scores higher on the StockData Score (15 against 6 for Biglari), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BDL | BH.A |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $107M | – |
| Share price | $57.38 | $1774.05 |
| Change, 1 year | 82.2% | 9.9% |
| Change, 5 years | 68.6% | 150% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.27 | 0.31 |
| Employees | 2,033 | 2,359 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 15 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 4 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividend score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 16.1× | – |
| P/S | 0.5× | – |
| P/B | 1.5× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.6× | – |
| P/FCF | 23.1× | – |
| FCF yield | 4.3% | – |
| Fair value | $69.59 | – |
| Margin of safety | 17.5% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 7.1% | 8.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 12.7% (better) | −1.8% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 53.6% (better) | −1221% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 53.2% | – |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 35.2% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 61.3% |
| Operating margin | 5.3% | – |
| Net margin | 3.1% (better) | −5.6% |
| FCF margin | 2.1% | 5.9% (better) |
| Return on equity | 9.9% (better) | −4.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 15.2% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.45 | 0.36 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 0.16 | 0.05 (better) |
| Interest coverage | 10.3× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.04 | 3.41 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 3.25 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 8 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 1.0% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 1.0% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 10.4% | 95.1% |
| Held by insiders | 70.5% | 68.1% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | $119K | $21.6M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 2.5% | – |
Go deeper
- BDL stock overview
- BDL income statement
- BDL valuation and score
- BH.A stock overview
- BH.A income statement
- BH.A valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.