Barclays vs NatWest
BCS and NWG side by side, both in commercial banks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BCS and NWG compare
Barclays grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.7% versus 3.1% for NatWest).
Barclays scores higher on the StockData Score (4 against 2 for NatWest), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BCS | NWG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $22.30 | $17.00 |
| Change, 1 year | 4.4% | 9.1% |
| Change, 5 years | 111% | 191% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.16 | 1.05 |
| Employees | 98K | 400 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.7% (better) | 3.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 5.4% | 17.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 13.7% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 21.6% | 26.9% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 37.5% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 64.6% | – |
| FCF margin | – | 21.2% |
| Return on equity | 9.2% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Payout ratio | 17.5% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 2.1% | 2.4% |
| Held by insiders | 0.00% | 18.9% |
Go deeper
- BCS stock overview
- BCS income statement
- BCS valuation and score
- NWG stock overview
- NWG income statement
- NWG valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.