Brunswick vs Cummins
BC and CMI side by side, both in industrial and commercial machinery and computer equipment. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BC and CMI compare
Cummins is the larger company, worth 14 times as much as Brunswick ($68.8B against $4.9B).
Brunswick grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (10.5% versus 2.9% for Cummins).
Both pay dividends: Brunswick yields 2.3% and Cummins 1.6%.
Cummins scores higher on the StockData Score (11 against 7 for Brunswick), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BC | CMI |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $4.9B | $68.8B |
| Share price | $75.34 | $500.09 |
| Change, 1 year | 10.2% | 13.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −24.8% | 111% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.22 | 0.98 |
| Employees | 14K | 67K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 7 | 11 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 0 | 1 (better) |
| Health score | 2 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 3 | 3 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | – | 25.6× |
| P/S | 0.9× (better) | 2.0× |
| P/B | 2.9× (better) | 5.4× |
| EV/EBITDA | 24.1× | 14.6× (better) |
| P/FCF | 14.3× (better) | 20.4× |
| PEG | – | 2.39 |
| FCF yield | 7.0% (better) | 4.9% |
| Fair value | $39.88 | $403.49 |
| Margin of safety | −88.9% | −23.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 10.5% (better) | 2.9% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 4.3% | 11.2% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −307% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −310% | −8.0% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 11.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 25.6% (better) | 25.3% |
| Operating margin | −0.37% | 11.2% (better) |
| Net margin | −1.5% | – |
| FCF margin | 6.1% | 9.7% (better) |
| Return on equity | −4.8% | – |
| Return on invested capital | −0.44% | 17.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.25 | 0.56 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | 6.54 | 0.66 (better) |
| Interest coverage | −0.2× | 12.1× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.45 | 1.73 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | 2.80 | 4.43 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 2.3% (better) | 1.6% |
| Years of dividend growth | 13 (better) | 8 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | 11.7% (better) | 7.7% |
| Buyback yield | 1.4% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 3.7% (better) | 1.6% |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 106% | 86.0% |
| Held by insiders | 1.6% | 0.30% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$7.1M (better) | −$37.7M |
| Superinvestors holding | 2 (better) | 1 |
| Short interest, % of float | 8.5% | 3.0% |
Go deeper
- BC stock overview
- BC income statement
- BC valuation and score
- CMI stock overview
- CMI income statement
- CMI valuation and score
Other comparisons
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.