Build-A-Bear Workshop vs Tokyo Lifestyle
BBW and TKLF side by side, both in miscellaneous retail. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BBW and TKLF compare
Tokyo Lifestyle grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (77.6% versus −0.91% for Build-A-Bear Workshop).
Build-A-Bear Workshop keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 10.0% compared with 0.19% at Tokyo Lifestyle.
Build-A-Bear Workshop pays a dividend yielding 3.2%; Tokyo Lifestyle does not pay one.
Build-A-Bear Workshop scores higher on the StockData Score (18 against 6 for Tokyo Lifestyle), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BBW | TKLF |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $353M | – |
| Share price | $28.69 | $1.53 |
| Change, 1 year | −41.1% | −49.7% |
| Change, 5 years | 58.2% | – |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.86 | 0.34 |
| Employees | 5,500 | 68 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 18 (better) | 6 |
| Valuation score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Growth score | 1 | 2 (better) |
| Performance score | 3 (better) | 2 |
| Health score | 6 (better) | 2 |
| Dividend score | 3 (better) | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 7.1× | – |
| P/S | 0.7× | – |
| P/B | 2.2× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | 4.1× | – |
| P/FCF | 14.4× | – |
| PEG | 0.87 | – |
| FCF yield | 6.9% | – |
| Fair value | $50.42 | – |
| Margin of safety | 43.1% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −0.91% | 77.6% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 15.7% (better) | 10.7% |
| Net income growth (TTM) | −12.9% (better) | −89.2% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | −9.6% (better) | −87.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | −35.6% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 56.7% | – |
| Operating margin | – | 0.86% |
| Net margin | 10.0% (better) | 0.19% |
| FCF margin | 4.7% (better) | −2.8% |
| Return on equity | 32.8% (better) | 1.7% |
| Return on invested capital | – | 1.6% |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 1.55 (better) |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 14.07 |
| Interest coverage | – | 1.6× |
| Current ratio | 1.60 (better) | 1.30 |
| Altman Z-score | 3.39 | – |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 (better) | 2 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | 3.2% | – |
| Payout ratio | 22.2% | 74.1% |
| Buyback yield | 10.6% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 13.8% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 104% | 0.00% |
| Held by insiders | 4.7% | 91.4% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$376K | $456K (better) |
| Superinvestors holding | 1 | – |
| Short interest, % of float | 23.1% | – |
Go deeper
- BBW stock overview
- BBW income statement
- BBW valuation and score
- TKLF stock overview
- TKLF income statement
- TKLF valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.