StockData

Beta Bionics vs Kestra Medical Technologies

BBNX and KMTS side by side, both in surgical, medical, and dental instruments and supplies. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BBNX and KMTS compare

Kestra Medical Technologies is the larger company, worth 1.9 times as much as Beta Bionics ($1.7B against $893M).

Kestra Medical Technologies grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (60.7% versus 43.7% for Beta Bionics).

Beta Bionics keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −65.3% compared with −140% at Kestra Medical Technologies.

Beta Bionics scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 5 for Kestra Medical Technologies), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBBNXKMTS
Size and price
Market cap$893M$1.7B
Share price$16.42$28.64
Change, 1 year−41.7%6.9%
Beta (5Y)1.281.21
Employees420443
StockData Score
Total score10 (better)5
Valuation score1 (better)0
Growth score23 (better)
Performance score1 (better)0
Health score6 (better)2
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S7.0× (better)16.0×
P/B2.2×–
FCF yield−7.4%−7.2% (better)
Fair value$15.49–
Margin of safety−6.0%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)43.7%60.7% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin58.6% (better)53.9%
Operating margin−72.7% (better)−134%
Net margin−65.3% (better)−140%
FCF margin−51.8% (better)−115%
Return on equity−23.9%–
Return on invested capital−64.4%–
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Interest coverage–−19.0×
Current ratio8.92 (better)4.69
Altman Z-score11.55 (better)4.94
Piotroski F-score6 (better)4
Dividends and buybacks
Shareholder yield0.00%0.00%
Ownership
Held by institutions88.2%98.6%
Held by insiders9.3%44.0%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$5.4M (better)−$15.3M
Short interest, % of float10.1%12.3%

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.