Beasley Broadcast vs Townsquare Media
BBGI and TSQ side by side, both in communications. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BBGI and TSQ compare
Townsquare Media is the larger company, worth 2.5 times as much as Beasley Broadcast ($27.3M against $11.1M).
Townsquare Media grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−2.1% versus −16.1% for Beasley Broadcast).
Townsquare Media keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −11.3% compared with −55.7% at Beasley Broadcast.
Townsquare Media pays a dividend yielding 40.0%; Beasley Broadcast does not pay one.
Townsquare Media scores higher on the StockData Score (7 against 4 for Beasley Broadcast), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BBGI | TSQ |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $11.1M | $27.3M |
| Share price | $5.97 | $1.50 |
| Change, 1 year | 32.1% | −72.3% |
| Change, 5 years | −86.7% | −88.8% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.35 | 1.05 |
| Employees | 460 | 20 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 7 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 0.1× |
| P/B | 0.3× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 22.3× |
| P/FCF | – | 2.2× |
| FCF yield | −255% | 44.6% (better) |
| Fair value | $24.82 | $14.85 |
| Margin of safety | 75.9% | 89.9% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −16.1% | −2.1% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −0.02% | 2.9% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −366% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | – | 24.8% |
| Operating margin | −116% | 0.47% (better) |
| Net margin | −55.7% | −11.3% (better) |
| FCF margin | −14.8% | 2.8% (better) |
| Return on equity | −116% | – |
| Return on invested capital | −63.7% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 3.73 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 20.90 |
| Interest coverage | −19.6× | 0.0× (better) |
| Current ratio | 1.23 (better) | 1.04 |
| Altman Z-score | −2.32 | −0.24 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 40.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 2 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 60.5% |
| Buyback yield | 0.84% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.84% | 40.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 12.0% | 52.7% |
| Held by insiders | 46.5% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.3M | −$2.3M (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 13.9% | – |
Go deeper
- BBGI stock overview
- BBGI income statement
- BBGI valuation and score
- TSQ stock overview
- TSQ income statement
- TSQ valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.