Beasley Broadcast vs Saga Communications
BBGI and SGA side by side, both in communications. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BBGI and SGA compare
Saga Communications is the larger company, worth 4.1 times as much as Beasley Broadcast ($45.3M against $11.1M).
Saga Communications grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−5.8% versus −16.1% for Beasley Broadcast).
Saga Communications keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −8.5% compared with −55.7% at Beasley Broadcast.
Saga Communications pays a dividend yielding 14.0%; Beasley Broadcast does not pay one.
Saga Communications scores higher on the StockData Score (10 against 4 for Beasley Broadcast), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BBGI | SGA |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $11.1M | $45.3M |
| Share price | $5.97 | $7.12 |
| Change, 1 year | 32.1% | −40.4% |
| Change, 5 years | −86.7% | −73.7% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.35 | 0.18 |
| Employees | 460 | 580 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 4 | 10 (better) |
| Valuation score | 3 | 3 |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 0 | 0 |
| Health score | 1 | 4 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 0.1× (better) | 0.4× |
| P/B | 0.3× (better) | 0.3× |
| FCF yield | −255% | −2.2% (better) |
| Fair value | $24.82 | $18.17 |
| Margin of safety | 75.9% (better) | 60.8% |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | −16.1% | −5.8% (better) |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −0.02% | 2.3% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | −525% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | −518% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | −116% | −12.3% (better) |
| Net margin | −55.7% | −8.5% (better) |
| FCF margin | −14.8% | −0.97% (better) |
| Return on equity | −116% | −5.7% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | −63.7% | −7.5% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 3.73 | 0.03 (better) |
| Interest coverage | −19.6× (better) | −31.7× |
| Current ratio | 1.23 | 2.24 (better) |
| Altman Z-score | −2.32 | 1.81 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 1 | 3 (better) |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 14.0% |
| Years of dividend growth | – | 0 |
| Dividend growth, 5Y average | – | 25.6% |
| Buyback yield | 0.84% | – |
| Shareholder yield | 0.84% | 14.0% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 12.0% | 53.6% |
| Held by insiders | 46.5% | 37.2% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$2.3M | −$68.4K (better) |
| Short interest, % of float | 13.9% | 0.32% |
Go deeper
- BBGI stock overview
- BBGI income statement
- BBGI valuation and score
- SGA stock overview
- SGA income statement
- SGA valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.