Blackberry vs Qualys
BB and QLYS side by side, both in computer programming, data processing, and other computer related services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BB and QLYS compare
Blackberry and Qualys are about the same size, with market caps of $5.5B and $6.3B.
On earnings, Qualys is cheaper: it trades at 30.4× trailing earnings, against 78.3× for Blackberry.
Blackberry grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (14.4% versus 10.4% for Qualys).
Qualys keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 29.6% compared with 13.1% at Blackberry.
Qualys scores higher on the StockData Score (19 against 9 for Blackberry), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BB | QLYS |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $5.5B | $6.3B |
| Share price | $9.40 | $182.69 |
| Change, 1 year | 103% | 20.2% |
| Change, 5 years | −10.0% | 32.9% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.55 | 1.21 |
| Employees | 1,820 | 2,625 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 9 | 19 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Performance score | 4 | 6 (better) |
| Health score | 3 | 6 (better) |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Valuation | ||
| P/E | 78.3× | 30.4× (better) |
| P/S | 9.0× | 8.8× (better) |
| P/B | 7.0× (better) | 9.8× |
| EV/EBITDA | 53.4× | 22.9× (better) |
| P/FCF | 59.9× | 19.5× (better) |
| PEG | – | 1.18 |
| FCF yield | 1.7% | 5.1% (better) |
| Fair value | $4.33 | $167.48 |
| Margin of safety | −117% | −9.1% (better) |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 14.4% (better) | 10.4% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | −9.3% | 13.0% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | – | 12.8% |
| EPS growth (TTM) | – | 16.5% |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | – | 19.3% |
| Profitability | ||
| Gross margin | 77.9% | 83.3% (better) |
| Operating margin | 13.6% | 34.4% (better) |
| Net margin | 13.1% | 29.6% (better) |
| FCF margin | 15.0% | 45.0% (better) |
| Return on equity | 10.6% | 36.3% (better) |
| Return on invested capital | 17.5% | 66.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | – | 0.00 |
| Interest coverage | 13.9× | – |
| Current ratio | 2.38 (better) | 1.53 |
| Altman Z-score | 5.69 | 8.41 (better) |
| Piotroski F-score | 7 | 7 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Buyback yield | 0.69% | 3.5% (better) |
| Shareholder yield | 0.69% | 3.5% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 50.8% | 107% |
| Held by insiders | 10.7% | 1.3% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$9.5M (better) | −$21.1M |
| Short interest, % of float | 7.2% | 9.0% |
Go deeper
- BB stock overview
- BB income statement
- BB valuation and score
- QLYS stock overview
- QLYS income statement
- QLYS valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.