Atlanta Braves vs Lucky Strike Entertainment
BATRA and LUCK side by side, both in amusement and recreation services. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BATRA and LUCK compare
Atlanta Braves is the larger company, worth 8.4 times as much as Lucky Strike Entertainment ($3.7B against $439M).
Atlanta Braves grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (5.5% versus 1.8% for Lucky Strike Entertainment).
Lucky Strike Entertainment keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −3.8% compared with −11.1% at Atlanta Braves.
Lucky Strike Entertainment pays a dividend yielding 7.5%; Atlanta Braves does not pay one.
Lucky Strike Entertainment scores higher on the StockData Score (5 against 1 for Atlanta Braves), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BATRA | LUCK |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Market cap | $3.7B | $439M |
| Share price | $57.54 | $3.22 |
| Change, 1 year | 35.2% | −59.4% |
| Change, 5 years | 88.1% | −68.0% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.48 | 0.72 |
| Employees | – | 14K |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 1 | 5 (better) |
| Valuation score | 0 | 2 (better) |
| Growth score | 0 | 0 |
| Performance score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 3 (better) |
| Valuation | ||
| P/S | 4.8× | 0.3× (better) |
| P/B | 6.9× | – |
| EV/EBITDA | – | 8.3× |
| P/FCF | – | 24.2× |
| FCF yield | – | 4.1% |
| Fair value | $35.51 | – |
| Margin of safety | −62.0% | – |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 5.5% (better) | 1.8% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | – | 25.8% |
| Profitability | ||
| Operating margin | −13.2% | 10.9% (better) |
| Net margin | −11.1% | −3.8% (better) |
| FCF margin | – | 1.4% |
| Return on equity | −15.4% | – |
| Return on invested capital | −6.5% | 8.2% (better) |
| Financial health | ||
| Debt / equity | 1.51 | – |
| Net debt / EBITDA | – | 6.61 |
| Interest coverage | −2.1× | – |
| Current ratio | 0.52 (better) | 0.50 |
| Altman Z-score | 1.42 (better) | 0.41 |
| Piotroski F-score | 5 (better) | 4 |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Dividend yield | – | 7.5% |
| Buyback yield | – | 6.9% |
| Shareholder yield | 0.00% | 14.3% (better) |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | 83.2% | 50.4% |
| Held by insiders | 6.7% | – |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$20.5M | $1.0M (better) |
Go deeper
- BATRA stock overview
- BATRA income statement
- BATRA valuation and score
- LUCK stock overview
- LUCK income statement
- LUCK valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.