StockData

Bark vs Tokyo Lifestyle

BARK and TKLF side by side, both in miscellaneous retail. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BARK and TKLF compare

Tokyo Lifestyle grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (77.6% versus −22.2% for Bark).

Tokyo Lifestyle keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 0.19% compared with −6.9% at Bark.

Bark scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 6 for Tokyo Lifestyle), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBARKTKLF
Size and price
Market cap$82.2M–
Share price$9.10$1.53
Change, 1 year−42.4%−49.7%
Change, 5 years−91.5%–
Beta (5Y)1.700.34
Employees50168
StockData Score
Total score9 (better)6
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score12 (better)
Performance score12 (better)
Health score4 (better)2
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.2×–
P/B1.1×–
P/FCF176×–
FCF yield0.57%–
Fair value$13.87–
Margin of safety34.4%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−22.2%77.6% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average0.84%10.7% (better)
Net income growth (TTM)–−89.2%
EPS growth (TTM)–−87.5%
EPS growth, 5Y average–−35.6%
Profitability
Gross margin64.0%–
Operating margin−7.5%0.86% (better)
Net margin−6.9%0.19% (better)
FCF margin0.13% (better)−2.8%
Return on equity−30.8%1.7% (better)
Return on invested capital−34.9%1.6% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.001.55 (better)
Net debt / EBITDA–14.07
Interest coverage−59.0×1.6× (better)
Current ratio1.89 (better)1.30
Altman Z-score−0.97–
Piotroski F-score4 (better)2
Dividends and buybacks
Payout ratio–74.1%
Buyback yield2.8%–
Shareholder yield2.8%–
Ownership
Held by institutions23.3%0.00%
Held by insiders–91.4%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$70.3K$456K (better)

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.