StockData

Bark vs Rent the Runway

BARK and RENT side by side, both in miscellaneous retail. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BARK and RENT compare

Bark and Rent the Runway are about the same size, with market caps of $82.3M and $82.1M.

Rent the Runway grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (21.2% versus −22.2% for Bark).

Rent the Runway keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of 11.8% compared with −6.9% at Bark.

Bark scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 6 for Rent the Runway), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBARKRENT
Size and price
Market cap$82.3M$82.1M
Share price$9.11$2.43
Change, 1 year−44.4%−47.3%
Change, 5 years−91.5%−99.3%
Beta (5Y)1.692.14
Employees501942
StockData Score
Total score9 (better)6
Valuation score3 (better)1
Growth score13 (better)
Performance score12 (better)
Health score4 (better)0
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.2×0.2× (better)
P/B1.1×–
P/FCF176×–
FCF yield0.57%–
Fair value$13.59–
Margin of safety33.0%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−22.2%21.2% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average0.84%15.9% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin64.0%74.7% (better)
Operating margin−7.5% (better)−12.3%
Net margin−6.9%11.8% (better)
FCF margin0.13%–
Return on equity−30.8%–
Return on invested capital−34.9% (better)−73.6%
Financial health
Debt / equity0.00–
Interest coverage−59.0×–
Current ratio1.89 (better)0.67
Altman Z-score−0.97 (better)−7.05
Piotroski F-score46 (better)
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield2.8% (better)−15.5%
Shareholder yield2.8% (better)−15.5%
Ownership
Held by institutions23.3%9.3%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$70.3K$5.8M (better)

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.