StockData

Bark vs High Tide

BARK and HITI side by side, both in miscellaneous retail. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BARK and HITI compare

High Tide grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (13.7% versus −22.2% for Bark).

Bark keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −6.9% compared with −8.5% at High Tide.

Bark scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 7 for High Tide), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBARKHITI
Size and price
Market cap$83.7M–
Share price$9.27$2.47
Change, 1 year−42.4%−16.6%
Change, 5 years−91.3%−59.4%
Beta (5Y)1.700.92
Employees501–
StockData Score
Total score9 (better)7
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score12 (better)
Performance score11
Health score44
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.2×–
P/B1.2×–
P/FCF179×–
FCF yield0.56%–
Fair value$13.72–
Margin of safety32.4%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−22.2%13.7% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average0.84%48.1% (better)
Profitability
Gross margin64.0% (better)25.8%
Operating margin−7.5%−2.4% (better)
Net margin−6.9% (better)−8.5%
FCF margin0.13%2.3% (better)
Return on equity−30.8% (better)−44.0%
Return on invested capital−34.9%−11.9% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.34 (better)
Net debt / EBITDA–−1.85
Interest coverage−59.0×–
Current ratio1.89 (better)1.37
Altman Z-score−0.97–
Piotroski F-score4 (better)3
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield2.7%–
Shareholder yield2.7%–
Ownership
Held by institutions23.3%7.6%
Held by insiders–0.00%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$70.3K–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.