StockData

Bark vs Boqii

BARK and BQ side by side, both in miscellaneous retail. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.

How BARK and BQ compare

Boqii grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (−10.3% versus −22.2% for Bark).

Boqii keeps more of each dollar of sales as profit, with a net margin of −1.2% compared with −6.9% at Bark.

Bark scores higher on the StockData Score (9 against 7 for Boqii), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.

Key numbers

A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.

MetricBARKBQ
Size and price
Market cap$82.3M–
Share price$9.11$0.430
Change, 1 year−44.4%−82.8%
Change, 5 years−91.5%−99.9%
Beta (5Y)1.691.59
Employees5019
StockData Score
Total score9 (better)7
Valuation score3 (better)0
Growth score11
Performance score13 (better)
Health score4 (better)3
Dividend score00
Valuation
P/S0.2×–
P/B1.1×–
P/FCF176×–
FCF yield0.57%–
Fair value$13.59–
Margin of safety33.0%–
Growth
Revenue growth (TTM)−22.2%−10.3% (better)
Revenue growth, 5Y average0.84% (better)−16.1%
Profitability
Gross margin64.0% (better)26.3%
Operating margin−7.5%−7.1% (better)
Net margin−6.9%−1.2% (better)
FCF margin0.13% (better)−7.2%
Return on equity−30.8%−2.7% (better)
Return on invested capital−34.9%−15.2% (better)
Financial health
Debt / equity0.000.09 (better)
Interest coverage−59.0×−36.3× (better)
Current ratio1.893.25 (better)
Altman Z-score−0.97–
Piotroski F-score44
Dividends and buybacks
Buyback yield2.8%–
Shareholder yield2.8%–
Ownership
Held by institutions23.3%–
Held by insiders–10.3%
Insider net buying, 12 months−$70.3K–

Go deeper

For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.