Credicorp vs NatWest
BAP and NWG side by side, both in commercial banks. Figures are trailing twelve months unless noted, from SEC filings and end-of-day prices.
How BAP and NWG compare
Credicorp grew revenue faster over the last twelve months (3.9% versus 3.1% for NatWest).
Credicorp scores higher on the StockData Score (8 against 2 for NatWest), which adds up 30 checks on valuation, growth, past performance, financial health and dividends.
Key numbers
A dot marks the better figure where higher or lower is clearly better.
| Metric | BAP | NWG |
|---|---|---|
| Size and price | ||
| Share price | $368.74 | $15.84 |
| Change, 1 year | 42.4% | −0.50% |
| Change, 5 years | 206% | 168% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.63 | 1.05 |
| Employees | 50K | 400 |
| StockData Score | ||
| Total score | 8 (better) | 2 |
| Valuation score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth score | 2 | 2 |
| Performance score | 5 (better) | 0 |
| Health score | 1 (better) | 0 |
| Dividend score | 0 | 0 |
| Growth | ||
| Revenue growth (TTM) | 3.9% (better) | 3.1% |
| Revenue growth, 5Y average | 9.2% | 17.6% (better) |
| Net income growth (TTM) | 25.9% | – |
| EPS growth (TTM) | 26.0% | 26.9% (better) |
| EPS growth, 5Y average | 82.0% | – |
| Profitability | ||
| Net margin | 24.3% | – |
| FCF margin | 29.1% (better) | 21.2% |
| Return on equity | 19.0% | – |
| Financial health | ||
| Piotroski F-score | 6 | – |
| Dividends and buybacks | ||
| Payout ratio | 45.9% | – |
| Ownership | ||
| Held by institutions | – | 2.4% |
| Held by insiders | 58.1% | 18.9% |
| Insider net buying, 12 months | −$1.5M | – |
Go deeper
- BAP stock overview
- BAP income statement
- BAP valuation and score
- NWG stock overview
- NWG income statement
- NWG valuation and score
For information only, not investment advice. Check the source filings before relying on any figure.